
Send this blogger here, please
Although I don’t consider my own blog to play more than a minute part of the internet’s development, it nonetheless does just by its presence, three hits a day on average. Odd to say and even odder to think it, this blog means that I’m part of the growing continuum of the world wide web. To be generous, let’s look at this blog as we would the Milky Way, which is nothing if not for the individual specks of light that make it replete.
In the novel Snow Crash, Neal Stephenson describes a future internet that contains every single output of the human race; a growing daily mass of information–be it photos, diary entries, student papers, jotted notes on beer coasters, official documents, art, literature, news, ad nauseam–that on first glance, is a dazzling array of light.
Where ancient Alexandria’s famed and former library contained the best of recorded human thought, Stephenson’s untamed internet database is its reverse, a mosaic of all thought and all output from humanity, documented online by CCTV footage, individual’s cameras, and professional production. In this sense, it isn’t much of a library per se, as there is no discriminating curator who distinguishes what goes into the collection. The phenomenal output of humankind gets dumped into this reservoir: imagine a mountain of amateur pornography washing up on the shores of Gauguin’s Tahiti.
The revelation of Stephenson’s idea, now seventeen years old, was that it came across as perfectly plausible. The implication is that the raw database is in part an involuntary reflex of the age imagined, a period when it is impossible to escape the digital eye and thus little if anything of the individual is secret, sacred, and private.
Any power of this mass of data comes to the most efficient searcher; the lone tree that hides in the jungle of information is the prize. The librarian’s filter only comes alive in the search parameters; the results being the searcher’s library of Alexandria.
At the time of the publication of Snow Crash in 1992, the internet’s capacity was not half of what it is today. The abundance of brute information on the internet has changed its appearance and content; the question now is not of getting information, but of getting the right information. In the blogger’s world, this means that every Tom, Dick, and Harry has their chance to air their view, but how to first distinguish the content? There’s no good filter for detailed written content–not yet, at least–and so the only way to know is to read.
Even as an involuntary part of the growing continuum of the world wide web, I haven’t and don’t spend much time paying attention to others’ blogs. There are exceptions, and here are a few blogs I’d like to present. These are the ones I check on a regular basis; what I like about them is that they demonstrate the forms a blog can take, ranging from the whimsical to the self-promotional professional; from the beat sports writer to the political insider; from image heavy content to only a volume of words.
The first is http://jeffjohnroberts.com/
This blog is run by one Jeff Roberts, and falls into the category, not really a blog. However, like a blog, this site contains Robert’s output as a burgeoning journalist, showing all of his published material to date, along with a bio and his contact details. I count this as a blog as it doesn’t fall into any other strict category that I can think of. Perhaps I’m being a bit liberal–or unimaginative–with the use of the word blog, but the point of a blog is that it can take on almost any form.
I got to to know Roberts through an eccentric neighbour I once had, who I took to be an unemployed, generous Quebec welfare, type. The neighbour was an unshaven, heavy drinking, chain-smoking, pot-smoking dude; and as far as I could hear through my walls, he would have fist fights with his guests after too many beers.
As things go, my old neighbour and Roberts still do have the occasional fist fight on empty stretches of highway during road trips, to the chagrin of their traveling companion. Fortunately, heavy drinkers with strong opinions also manage to get ahead in life, hangovers and swollen lips taken in stride: Roberts is a lawyer of some kind and my old neighbour is a theoretical physicist of some kind, employed to think, drink, smoke, and fight by a university.
The next blog is http://amypagnotta.blogspot.com/
Amy Pagnotta’s blog is a whimsical, fun, and introspective account of life. It acts as a long-standing online journal, made up of a collage of personal thoughts, ideas, poetry, drama, ramblings, photography, and updates. It’s located at the neat end of the blog sphere, as it verges on the self-indulgent without being so; taken as a whole, it is a kind of Impressionism of the Gauguinesque type, without the topless island ladies.
What it puts on display, like Robert’s blog, and my own, is Pagnotta’s free-thinking, creative, world view.
I first met Pagnotta ten years gone by; my first introduction to her personality was at a large bar that was split between three stories indoors and a massive outdoor courtyard. We were in the courtyard, enjoying our drinks when she decided to go walk in the bar’s fountain, a beautiful thing located in the centre of the courtyard. She declared that she wanted to walk in the fountain, and so, shoes off, into the fountain she went, all to the great delight of the general public sitting around it. The bouncers were not amused–but did nothing–and upon her return to the table, we received several rounds of beer from the appreciative crowd. The thing is, Pagnotta wasn’t yet drunk; it was an innocent whimsy and this sense of unfettered fun is carried over into her blog.
Next up is http://inkskratch.com/blog
Eric Kim is a freelance illustrator and comic book artist. His blog–and the website as a whole–is the most comprehensive of all the blogs listed here. It has several dimensions, serving at once as portfolio, weekly online comic (which was discontinued just a short while back), artistic update, and arena for personal updates; in general, it serves as platform for his creative and personal output.
Early in his career, he worked for a video game company and his job there was to draw the heads of professional sports players for a video game. The catch was that he had to draw a two-dimensional representation that would be scanned and then stretched onto a digital three-dimensional frame. In other words, he had to draw an accurate face that was compressed around the eyes, nose, and mouth.
I met him one day for coffee during his lunch break and was a bit late in arriving. When I did sit down with him, he showed me what he had been drawing over half a cup of coffee. It was a semi-erotic Japanese manga-style image, high in detail, realism, and style, all drawn with clean lines and very well done. It demonstrated his speed as an artist and his ability to draw in different styles; it was also done on his lunch break, which speaks to his compulsive work habits, and his current interests as an artist.
This brings me to http://glenpearson.wordpress.com/
I don’t know Glen Pearson, but I would like to. This is a very recent addition to my blog roll and his is a very good political blog. Pearson is a Canadian parliamentarian, former firefighter, and comes off as one of those all-round good guys. I was pointed to his blog by a friend and it was very interesting to see that he shares many of my own political concerns and interests.
While I’m not a great fan of the Liberal Party of Canada, it has as much to do with their conduct in office as it does with my concerns with the underlying issues of a political parties, period. Individuals like Pearson seem to recognize the problems of partisanship in politics and how it does not serve the interests of the public at large while also undermining the political process.
Pearson’s is a thoughtful and political blog, an insider’s view of Canadian national politics, and isn’t partisan heavy, which is a relief. What it does is open up the doors of a political party and reveals that an individual within it is a clear thinker and a reasonable type. The issue is why this level of mature, informed, discourse is absent from the daily political process.
Moving on, here’s http://www.raptorblog.com/
Often, the best writing in a newspaper is found in the sports pages. Beat writers have are given the opportunity to write often and have a subject that deals with public figures of fame and high public recognition. Between balancing reporting the facts of the game and balancing the egos of the sports star, the sports writer has an opportunity to write about life as played out in a game.
The subject allows freedom to the writer, and so the skill of the writer is allowed a lot of room–provided the writing skill exists. Unfortunately, many newspapers today do not allow for the sports writer to write as expansively as they did in years gone by. And so the blogs fill the gap.
Clarefoot is not a newspaper journalist, but he is a good blogger and his posts are entertaining, irreverent, often crude, and taps into the tremendous world of professional sports blogging. What amuses me about Clarefoot is that his information is well presented, his opinions unfettered, and he posts regularly , which is the professional bar for any blog.
The issue of professional writers versus bloggers is one that Clarefoot often brings up, both out of insecurity and good reason. His argument is that serious bloggers deserve at least the same credibility that is accorded newspaper and magazine writers, most often when it comes to releasing a breaking story first.
This segues to http://thestar.blogs.com/raptors/
Doug Smith is a newspaper sports writer and a rock-steady blogger. As far as I’m concerned, he writes too much and in doing so, satisfies the needy nature of obsessive sports fans while also showing a bit of the blogger’s unfortunate tendency towards written diarrhea. Unaffected, polite, thoughtful, and down-to-earth, Smith posts daily, often twice daily, and is as dedicated to his fans as he is to covering his sports interests.
I once wrote him to ask him where I could watch a basketball game on the television. My basketball team, the woeful Toronto Raptors, have a strange television contract that has their games split between four broadcasters, which translates into the practical frustration of having to cherry-pick a sports bar to catch a given game–it’s no longer possible to go to the same ol’ bar to catch the game.
Tangentially, I emailed Doug with a query one desperate day and he recommended a place within an hour of receiving the message. Lo and behold, he too was there to watch the game, tapping away the whole game.
Smith is one of Clarefoot’s favourite to lambast when he criticizes the perceived superiority of newspaper writers; Clarefoot’s point is that their sources are no different than his and they only receive the lion’s share of the kudos is because of their medium.
Finally, for now http://www.theglobeandmail.com/blogs/from-deep/
Michael Grange’s blog is the best written sports blog of the three mentioned here. Like Doug Smith, he’s also a newspaper journalist and his blog serves as personal complement to his professional columns.
His blog is also the one that is least updated and shows the strain of writing well, regularly. Thoughtful, insightful, personal, and professional, Grange doesn’t go for quantity and aims for quality. His output is strong and consistent–when it does appear–and well worth reading.
What Grange recognizes is that the blog is only as good as the content that is provided on it. While Clarefoot has a rabid interest in Toronto Raptors basketball, Grange is more intellectually passionate about the subject and his intellect–sorry, Clarefoot–prevents him from ranting and raving, or doing what Smith does, which is to answer almost all of his mail and post his responses online.
On the whole, this brief of blogs is very limited, yet also hints at the potential range and scope of the medium, notably their shortcomings as well as their advantages over the formal publishing sector, which, in its own right, is a very constrained, nepotistic, and conservative industry on the whole. If we are to say that blog writers and print writers are of equal skill, then the real difference is the money: capitalism does have negative influence over the freedom of speech.
Returning to the idea of the spiraling, labyrinthine, library that was discussed at the beginning of the post, my own search filter is fairly specific–restricted to friends, politics, and an unhealthy interest in professional basketball–but this also brings to mind Borges’ conception of the library. An intellectual space that reflects the best and untoward tendencies of the individual and the society around them, infinite and ever-intriguing.